Does AI Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuance?
A Source Study and a Classroom Response
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, few areas have seen as much transformation as the realm of writing. From email composition to creative writing, AI assistants are becoming ubiquitous, promising increased efficiency and improved output. However, as we embrace these technological advancements, we must also grapple with their broader implications on culture, creativity, and individual expression.
Introducing Two AI Literacy Courses for Educators
Pragmatic AI for Educators (Pilot Program)
Basic AI classroom tools
Cost: $20
Pragmatic AI Prompting for Advanced Differentiation
Advanced AI skills for tailored instruction
Cost: $200
Free Offer:
30-minute strategy sessions
Tailored course implementation for departments, schools, or districts
Practical steps for AI integration
Interested in enhancing AI literacy in your educational community? Contact nicolas@pragmaticaisolutions.net to schedule a session or learn more.
The Double-Edged Sword of AI Writing Assistance
A recent study from Cornell University researchers Dhruv Agarwal, Mor Naaman, and Aditya Vashistha titled "AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances" has shed light on a concerning trend in AI-assisted writing. The study reveals that AI writing suggestions are subtly but significantly pushing non-Western users towards Western writing styles, raising alarm bells about cultural homogenization in the digital age.
Key findings from the study include:
Productivity Disparity: While AI writing tools improved efficiency for both Indian and American users, the gains were noticeably higher for American participants.
Cultural Homogenization: Indian participants' writing styles shifted towards Western norms when using AI suggestions, potentially erasing cultural nuances in their expression.
Subtle but Profound Changes: The AI-induced changes went beyond surface-level corrections, affecting deeper aspects of writing style such as lexical diversity.
These findings highlight a crucial challenge in the integration of AI into our writing processes. As the researchers note:
"Our work provides concrete evidence of AI colonialism, with the embedded LLM offering suggestions that shift the Indians' writing styles to align with American styles. This homogenization reflects a form of cultural imperialism, where one culture dominates and suppresses the plurality of knowledge, practices, and languages, reinforcing Western hegemony over values."
The Bigger Picture: AI's Cultural Impact
This study isn't just about writing styles; it's a wake-up call about the broader implications of AI integration in our daily lives. As we rush to embrace AI tools for their efficiency and convenience, are we inadvertently participating in a new form of cultural imperialism?
The Homogenization of Global Culture: AI models, predominantly trained on Western data and developed by Western companies, are now shaping how people worldwide express themselves. This raises concerns about the preservation of linguistic and cultural diversity in our increasingly digital world.
The Power Dynamics of AI Development: The study highlights the need for more diverse representation in AI development. If AI tools continue to be created primarily by Western tech giants, will they inevitably reflect and propagate Western cultural norms?
The Subtle Erosion of Cultural Identity: Perhaps most concerning is how these changes occur almost imperceptibly. Users may not even realize their writing style is being altered, leading to a gradual erosion of cultural linguistic traits over time.
These findings present a complex challenge for educators, writers, and technologists alike. While the efficiency gains of AI writing tools are undeniable, the potential for cultural homogenization raises serious ethical concerns. As an educator deeply invested in nurturing authentic voices and preserving cultural diversity, I found myself grappling with these issues in my own classroom.
The question that loomed large was:
How can we harness the benefits of AI writing assistance while safeguarding the unique cultural expressions and individual voices of our students?
Is there a way to use AI as a tool for empowerment rather than homogenization?
One initial response came from one of my favorite persons in my LinkedIn network, Kimberley Pace Becker, Ph.D:
Fascinating study! I see some interesting connections to English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) research:
“(1) Dynamic evolution: International English constantly evolves. AI might be influencing these natural shifts rather than simply imposing Western norms.
(2) Hybrid practices: ELF studies show hybrid forms of English emerging. Could AI-influenced writing represent a new hybrid rather than pure Westernization?
(3) Pragmatic adaptations: Speakers adjust language for global communication.
AI may promote pragmatic strategies useful internationally, complicating the idea of cultural imposition.
I'm certainly not negating concerns about homogenization, but many findings from ELF suggest the observed changes might reflect complex global language dynamics. More research is needed on how AI writing tools interact with diverse English usage worldwide.”
A Classroom Experiment: Seeking Balance
Motivated by these concerns and seeing the inevitability of AI's role in future writing processes, I decided to experiment with a nuanced approach in my high school English class. The goal was to find a middle ground – a way to leverage AI's strengths while actively preserving and encouraging students' unique voices and cultural perspectives.
I designed a writing assignment on Frankenstein that intentionally integrated AI assistance, but with careful scaffolding to prioritize students' original thinking and expression. Here's how the process unfolded:
Scaffolded Brainstorming: Students first engaged in independent brainstorming, developing their thesis and subclaims, and locating supporting quotes from the text. This crucial step ensured that the core ideas originated from the students themselves, reflecting their unique interpretations and cultural perspectives.
AI-Assisted Outlining: Only after this initial work did students use AI to generate three basic outlines based on their ideas. The AI was given a carefully crafted prompt that emphasized respecting the student's original concepts while providing structural support.
Physical Separation: Students brought printed outlines to class, creating a tangible separation between AI-generated content and their own composition. This physical divide was intended to create a cognitive separation, reminding students that the AI input was a tool, not the source of their ideas.
Human-Centric Composition: In class, students composed their essays using the AI-generated outlines as a framework, but infusing the content with their own voice and ideas. They were encouraged to deviate from the outline where they felt it necessary, ensuring the final product reflected their unique perspective.
Anti-Copying Measures: The writing platform, PowerNotes, tracked for copied and pasted text, encouraging original composition. This step was crucial in ensuring that students were truly engaging with the material and expressing ideas in their own words, rather than relying too heavily on AI-generated content.
The results were remarkable. As I observed the class, I was amazed to see how relaxed and energized the whole classroom space was. Students seemed more confident in their writing, likely due to the organizational support provided by the AI-generated outlines. Yet, as I reviewed their work, I saw a beautiful diversity of perspectives and writing styles that reflected the unique voices of my students.
In many ways, I felt like this was perhaps the first authentic writing experience I have managed to orchestrate in-class with a full lean into AI since the drop of GPT in November '22. It seemed to strike a balance between leveraging AI's capabilities and preserving individual expression.
Reflections on the Process
While the results of this experiment were encouraging, it's important to note that this approach is not a panacea for the challenges highlighted in the Cornell study. The risk of cultural homogenization through AI remains a significant concern, particularly in contexts where such careful scaffolding may not be possible.
Moreover, this classroom experiment took place in a U.S. high school setting, and the dynamics might be different in other cultural contexts or with students who are not native English speakers. The process required significant preparation and oversight, which may not be feasible in all educational settings.
However, what this experience did demonstrate is the potential for thoughtful integration of AI in ways that can enhance rather than diminish individual expression. It showed that with intentional design, AI can be used as a tool to support organization and ideation, while still leaving room for – and indeed, encouraging – the expression of unique voices and perspectives.
Balancing Progress and Preservation: The Road Ahead
As we continue to navigate the integration of AI into writing processes, both in educational settings and beyond, several key considerations emerge:
Diversifying AI Training Data: Ensuring AI models are trained on a wide range of cultural expressions and writing styles. This is crucial to reduce the Western bias currently present in many AI systems.
Developing Culturally-Aware AI: Creating AI systems that can recognize and preserve diverse cultural linguistic traits. This might involve developing region-specific models or incorporating cultural context into AI decision-making processes.
Implementing User Controls: Allowing individuals to adjust AI suggestions to align with their cultural background or personal writing style. This empowers users to benefit from AI assistance while maintaining their unique voice.
Promoting AI Literacy: Educating users about the potential impacts of AI on their writing and how to maintain their unique voice. This is particularly important in educational settings, where students are developing their writing skills and personal voice.
Encouraging Innovative Teaching Methods: Supporting educators who develop methods to integrate AI in ways that enhance rather than diminish individual expression. My classroom experiment is just one example – we need a diversity of approaches to address this complex issue.
Ethical AI Development: Pushing for more diverse representation in AI development teams and incorporating ethical considerations into the AI development process from the ground up.
Educating AI is a community-supported publication. All content is free. Paid subscriptions keep the doors open. $4.99 monthly. $50 yearly. Continuing to study the long-term effects of AI writing assistance on cultural expression and individual writing styles. We need to remain vigilant and responsive to emerging trends and challenges.
Conclusion: A Path Forward
The tension between AI efficiency and cultural preservation in writing is not an insurmountable challenge, but one that requires conscious effort and innovative solutions. The Cornell study serves as a crucial reminder of the potential pitfalls, while my classroom experience offers a glimpse of how we might harness AI's power without sacrificing diversity and individuality.
As we move forward in this AI-augmented world, it's crucial that we remain vigilant about the broader societal impacts of these tools.
The convenience of AI writing assistants shouldn't come at the cost of cultural diversity.
Instead, with thoughtful implementation and continued innovation, we can create a future where AI and human creativity coexist and complement each other, enhancing our ability to express ourselves while celebrating the rich tapestry of global cultural expression.
The path ahead is not about choosing between AI and cultural preservation, but about finding ways to embrace both. It's a challenge that will require ongoing dialogue, research, and experimentation. But with continued efforts from researchers, educators, developers, and users alike, we can work towards a future where AI enhances rather than diminishes the beautiful diversity of human expression.
As educators, writers, and technologists, we have a responsibility to shape the future of AI-assisted writing in a way that enhances rather than diminishes the beautiful complexity of human expression. Let's embrace this challenge with creativity, critical thinking, and a steadfast commitment to preserving the diverse voices that make our global discourse so rich and vibrant.
Nick Potkalitsky, Ph.D.
Check out some of my favorite Substacks:
Terry Underwood’s Learning to Read, Reading to Learn: The most penetrating investigation of the intersections between compositional theory, literacy studies, and AI on the internet!!!
Suzi’s When Life Gives You AI: An cutting-edge exploration of the intersection among computer science, neuroscience, and philosophy
Alejandro Piad Morffis’s Mostly Harmless Ideas: Unmatched investigations into coding, machine learning, computational theory, and practical AI applications
Amrita Roy’s The Pragmatic Optimist: My favorite Substack that focuses on economics and market trends.
Michael Woudenberg’s Polymathic Being: Polymathic wisdom brought to you every Sunday morning with your first cup of coffee
Rob Nelson’s AI Log: Incredibly deep and insightful essay about AI’s impact on higher ed, society, and culture.
Michael Spencer’s AI Supremacy: The most comprehensive and current analysis of AI news and trends, featuring numerous intriguing guest posts
Daniel Bashir’s The Gradient Podcast: The top interviews with leading AI experts, researchers, developers, and linguists.
Daniel Nest’s Why Try AI?: The most amazing updates on AI tools and techniques
Riccardo Vocca’s The Intelligent Friend: An intriguing examination of the diverse ways AI is transforming our lives and the world around us.
Jason Gulya’s The AI Edventure: An important exploration of cutting edge innovations in AI-responsive curriculum and pedagogy.
Beautiful work, Nick. The strategy of human brainstorming followed by AI integration with an AI-Mentor prompt disallowing the introduction of new ideas is spot on. I’d call it a “full brainer” vs a “no brainer.” It taps the strength of a human and uses the bot for scaffolding. I’m wondering what your students thoughts were during the writing when the cut and paste feature prevented lifting AI text. A suggestion: pick four of your most metacognitively aware writers and ask them to do brief think alouds when they note interesting micro situations and analyze the tapes for themes and patterns.
I’d also be interested in having half of them get the option of asking AI-Mentor to discuss how well the thesis statement squares with the bot outline. With the preemptive command “do not introduce new ideas” this discussion could return some control over the outline back to the students. I’m uneasy about asking the bot create the outline. At that point the bot has control of the macrostructure of the text, which I as a writer want to control even more than I want to control word choice. Text structure is importance for emphasis, which is a writer-reader dimension.
Your study supports an additional conclusion as well. If our society truly cares about AI doing a coup on human heads, it’s going to have to allocate resources and it needs a central, enlightened, scholarly national headquarters. This nonsense about fearing the unknown needs to morph into public dollars going to schools to support teachers like you with the knowledge and skills to implement and monitor highly complex instructional designs. This is a new world where teachers will need to know their students better than before. Let’s stop the social moaning and get to work eh?
This is great, Nick!
I really like this for an in-person class! I am also looking for an alternative to Power Notes, just because I don’t have money for it!