Federal AI Regulation Showdown: The 10-Year Ban on State Oversight
Is Congress about to hit the pause button on all state AI regulations?
If you find value in our work and want to help shape the future of AI education and awareness, consider becoming a paid subscriber today. To make it easy, we’re offering a forever 20% discount through this special link:
Your support directly helps us broaden our reach and deepen our impact. Let’s build this together.
A controversial provision hidden in the House Republicans' 2025 budget reconciliation bill has sparked intense debate across the tech policy landscape. If passed, it would impose a sweeping 10-year moratorium on all state and local AI regulation—effectively centralizing all AI oversight at the federal level, where currently few guardrails exist.
What's Actually Being Proposed?
The provision, tucked away in Section 43201 of the "Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative," states:
"No state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act."
This comes at a pivotal moment when states have been leading the charge on AI oversight:
In 2024 alone, 31 states enacted AI-related legislation
At least 27 states passed laws addressing deepfakes
Several states implemented comprehensive frameworks requiring responsible AI development
The Battle Lines Are Drawn
Pro-Preemption Camp: "We Need Regulatory Clarity"
Those supporting the federal preemption argue that America's global AI competitiveness is at stake:
Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) warns that "50 different state regulations" would create "an enormous barrier to entry for innovation"
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Brett Guthrie frames it as part of the tech race with China: "We must make sure that we win the battle against China" by avoiding regulations similar to "Europe or California"
Anti-Preemption Camp: "This Leaves Americans Unprotected"
Critics view the proposal as dangerously overreaching:
Senator Ed Markey cautions this won't lead to an "AI Golden Age" but rather a "Dark Age for the environment, our children, and marginalized communities."
Grace Gedye, policy analyst for AI issues at Consumer Reports, argues“Congress has long abdicated its responsibility to pass laws to address emerging consumer protection harms; under this bill, it would also prohibit the states from taking actions to protect their residents.”
Constitutional Showdown Brewing?
The proposal has legal experts questioning its constitutionality under the 10th Amendment, which reserves powers not explicitly given to the federal government for the states. While proponents might claim AI falls under interstate commerce regulation, many predict years of lawsuits would follow.
What Do Americans Actually Want?
The timing is particularly interesting given public sentiment:
82% of voters support creating a federal agency to regulate AI
67% doubt that government oversight will be sufficient or timely
Will This Actually Pass? Probably Not.
Despite the bold proposal, several factors make passage unlikely:
Senate Resistance: Even within Republican ranks, senators like Ron Johnson (R-WI) have criticized the bill, threatening party unity
The Byrd Rule: Senate procedural rules require reconciliation provisions to have direct fiscal impact—this AI moratorium's connection to federal spending is tenuous at best
Constitutional Questions: The sweeping nature of the preemption raises serious legal concerns that could derail implementation
The Stakes Are High
As AI researcher Gary Marcus and state legislators have warned, this is a pivotal moment that could determine "whether the door on AI regulation will slam shut for at least the next decade."
The bottom line: While this dramatic preemption attempt will likely fail in the Senate, the battle highlights the growing tension between innovation-focused and protection-focused approaches to AI governance—a debate that will only intensify as AI becomes more powerful and pervasive.
What do you think? Should states be allowed to regulate AI, or should we leave it to the federal government? Let us know in the comments!
Nick Potkalitsky Ph.D.
Check out some of our favorite Substacks:
Mike Kentz’s AI EduPathways: Insights from one of our most insightful, creative, and eloquent AI educators in the business!!!
Terry Underwood’s Learning to Read, Reading to Learn: The most penetrating investigation of the intersections between compositional theory, literacy studies, and AI on the internet!!!
Suzi’s When Life Gives You AI: An cutting-edge exploration of the intersection among computer science, neuroscience, and philosophy
Alejandro Piad Morffis’s Mostly Harmless Ideas: Unmatched investigations into coding, machine learning, computational theory, and practical AI applications
Michael Woudenberg’s Polymathic Being: Polymathic wisdom brought to you every Sunday morning with your first cup of coffee
Rob Nelson’s AI Log: Incredibly deep and insightful essay about AI’s impact on higher ed, society, and culture.
Michael Spencer’s AI Supremacy: The most comprehensive and current analysis of AI news and trends, featuring numerous intriguing guest posts
Daniel Bashir’s The Gradient Podcast: The top interviews with leading AI experts, researchers, developers, and linguists.
Daniel Nest’s Why Try AI?: The most amazing updates on AI tools and techniques
Riccardo Vocca’s The Intelligent Friend: An intriguing examination of the diverse ways AI is transforming our lives and the world around us.
Jason Gulya’s The AI Edventure: An important exploration of cutting edge innovations in AI-responsive curriculum and pedagogy.
The problem is that Republicans cannot be trusted to do anything useful, but can be trusted to do harm. Right now, they run the Federal government. So now I would oppose this bill. But in the long term it is SO clearly a national issue, if not international.