The Generation in the Gap: Reimagining Education in the Age of AI

Students want educators to create action zones that empower them in an era of AI. What are we waiting for?

Join our nearly 9,000 subscribers by clicking below and becoming a subscriber. Consider becoming a paid subscriber to support the work of Educating AI.

---

We need to talk about the students sitting in our classrooms right now. They didn't ask to be here—caught up through no choice of their own in one of the most profoundly transitional moments in the history of education. Yet here they are, navigating a landscape that shifts beneath their feet with each technological advancement, each new AI capability, each institutional scramble to keep pace with change.

These students carry in their pockets or balanced on their desks a supercomputer loaded with the highest level of artificial intelligence in the history of humankind. The tools at their fingertips can write essays, solve equations, generate code, analyze literature, and provide instant explanations for virtually any question they might encounter in their academic work. And we—their teachers, administrators, and educational policymakers—are still figuring out what this means.

---

The Efficiency Trap

Here's where things get complicated, and where our current approach reveals its fundamental misunderstanding of what learning actually requires. The AI interfaces students use daily—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and countless others—were designed by corporations with efficiency and productivity in mind. They're built to eliminate friction, to provide smooth, immediate answers, to make tasks easier and faster to complete.

But education requires struggle and friction. Learning happens in the space between confusion and clarity, in the productive discomfort of not knowing, in the iterative process of working through problems that don't have obvious solutions. When students can bypass this essential struggle with a few keystrokes, something fundamental breaks down in the learning process.

We're now scrambling to create tools that offer friction-filled interactions with AI—educational platforms that slow down the process, that require students to work through steps, that somehow preserve the struggle that learning demands. But the cat is already out of the bag. Students have access to the frictionless versions, and no amount of institutional policy can stuff that reality back into containment.

---

The Policing Problem

This brings us to one of the most troubling aspects of our current predicament: teachers are left without any way of definitively knowing whether students are using AI. We've written policies that presume such detection is actually possible, creating elaborate systems of policing and regulation based on a false premise.

The reality is that AI detection tools are unreliable at best, and sophisticated AI use can be virtually undetectable. We're asking teachers to become investigators, spending precious time and energy trying to discern whether a student's work is "authentic" according to standards that may no longer make sense. This puts educators in an impossible position—enforcing rules that can't be consistently enforced while trying to maintain educational integrity in a system that may need to be fundamentally reconsidered.

Meanwhile, the discourse around "academic integrity" often misses the point entirely. We're so focused on preventing students from using these tools that we're failing to ask the more important question: how do we design learning experiences that remain meaningful in a world where these tools exist?

---

The Job Readiness Dead End

When educational leaders try to address these challenges, the conversation inevitably turns to job readiness. What skills will students need when they graduate? What will the workplace look like in ten, twenty years? How do we prepare students for jobs that don't yet exist?

This job readiness approach eventually just throws its hands up. We cannot know what the future holds, the argument goes, so how can we possibly prepare students for it? This leads to vague platitudes about "21st-century skills," "learning how to learn," “AI literacy,” and "adaptability"—concepts so broad and undefined that they provide little practical guidance for educators trying to design meaningful learning experiences.

But this hand-wringing misses something crucial: we're asking the wrong question entirely.

---

What We Actually Know

Here's what I want to suggest: we already know the skills students need, and it goes far beyond the ambiguous enthusiasm about learning, the ability to learn, and metacognition that dominate these discussions. We don't need to predict the unknowable future of work to understand what intellectual capabilities will serve students well regardless of how technology evolves.

Students need to learn deep reading—not the skimming and scanning that dominates digital interaction, but the kind of sustained, careful attention to text that allows for genuine comprehension and analysis. They need source interrogation skills—the ability to distinguish credible information from noise, to understand how bias shapes perspective, to trace claims back to their origins and evaluate their reliability.

They need creative thinking—the capacity to generate novel solutions, make unexpected connections, and approach problems from multiple angles. They need computational thinking—not just coding, but the broader ability to understand systems, break down complex problems into manageable parts, and think logically about processes and relationships.

They need what I call deep numeracy—mathematical reasoning that goes far beyond mere calculation to include statistical literacy, proportional reasoning, and the ability to work with quantitative information in meaningful ways. They need rhetorical analysis—the skill to understand how arguments work and fail, how language shapes meaning, and how communication functions in different contexts.

And crucially, they need historical and cultural competency—the understanding of how past events connect to present realities and how different perspectives shape our understanding of the world around us.

These aren't "soft skills" or buzzwords. These are fundamental intellectual tools that have been essential for decades and will remain essential regardless of how artificial intelligence develops. They represent the kind of thinking that makes us distinctly human and that no amount of technological advancement can replace

---

The Real Question

So the question isn't what to teach—it's how do we create classroom spaces where students can develop their mastery in these skills when AI can provide instant, surface-level responses to almost any prompt or problem?

This is where we need to fundamentally rethink our approach. If homework—as we've traditionally conceived it—can be completed by AI, then homework may simply be a thing of the past. The classroom needs to become the action zone, the place where the real intellectual work happens.

---

The Classroom as Action Zone

What does this look like in practice? It means transforming our classrooms into spaces where students engage in work that can't be outsourced to artificial intelligence. Instead of assigning essays to be written alone at home, we create collaborative writing workshops where students develop their ideas through discussion, peer feedback, and iterative revision. Instead of problem sets completed in isolation, we facilitate mathematical reasoning circles where students explain their thinking processes and learn from each other's approaches.

We design source analysis workshops where students interrogate evidence together, examining multiple perspectives and building their capacity to distinguish reliable information from propaganda or misinformation. We create live debates where students must defend their reasoning in real-time, developing their rhetorical skills through actual practice rather than theoretical study.

We facilitate creative challenges that require students to build on each other's ideas, fostering the kind of collaborative innovation that represents the best of human thinking. We organize historical inquiry sessions where students examine multiple perspectives on past events, developing the cultural competency that allows them to understand how context shapes understanding.

In these classrooms, teachers aren't lecturers delivering content to passive recipients. They're orchestrators of intellectual experiences, creating the conditions where deep learning can occur. They guide students through productive struggle, facilitate meaningful collaboration, and help learners develop the metacognitive awareness that allows them to understand their own thinking processes.

---

The Power of Presence

This approach requires us to recognize something that our efficiency-obsessed culture often overlooks: there's magic in what happens when minds meet to grapple with complexity together. The kind of learning we most value—the development of critical thinking, creative problem-solving, and deep understanding—emerges through interaction, through the friction of different perspectives, through the real-time negotiation of ideas that can only happen when people are present with each other.

When students leave these classroom experiences, they've done the thinking, not just received the answers. They've wrestled with ambiguity, defended their reasoning, revised their understanding based on new evidence, and experienced the satisfaction that comes from intellectual growth that they've earned through effort.

---

Beyond the Crisis Narrative

This isn't a story about the death of education or the end of human learning. It's a story about evolution, about adaptation, about the possibility of creating educational experiences that are more engaging, more meaningful, and more effective than what we've had before.

The generation caught in this gap—our current students—doesn't need us to solve the problem of artificial intelligence for them. They need us to create learning environments where they can develop the intellectual tools that will serve them well no matter how technology continues to evolve.

They need classrooms that honor the complexity of real learning, that provide the friction necessary for growth, and that recognize the irreplaceable value of human thinking in community with other human thinkers.

The future of education isn't about competing with AI or preventing students from using it. It's about understanding what makes learning distinctly human and creating the conditions where that kind of learning can flourish. When we do that, we don't just prepare students for an uncertain future—we give them the intellectual foundation they need to help create a better one.

The classroom, reimagined as an action zone where minds meet to engage with what matters most, becomes not just a place of learning but a space of hope. And perhaps that's exactly what this generation in the gap needs most: not just skills for the future, but the experience of what it means to think deeply, together, right now.

Nick Potkalitsky, Ph.D.

---

Check out some of our favorite Substacks:

Mike Kentz’s AI EduPathways: Insights from one of our most insightful, creative, and eloquent AI educators in the business!!!

Terry Underwood’s Learning to Read, Reading to Learn: The most penetrating investigation of the intersections between compositional theory, literacy studies, and AI on the internet!!!

Suzi’s When Life Gives You AI: A cutting-edge exploration of the intersection among computer science, neuroscience, and philosophy

Alejandro Piad Morffis’s The Computerist Journal: Unmatched investigations into coding, machine learning, computational theory, and practical AI applications

Michael Woudenberg’s Polymathic Being: Polymathic wisdom brought to you every Sunday morning with your first cup of coffee

Rob Nelson’s AI Log: Incredibly deep and insightful essay about AI’s impact on higher ed, society, and culture.

Michael Spencer’s AI Supremacy: The most comprehensive and current analysis of AI news and trends, featuring numerous intriguing guest posts

Daniel Bashir’s The Gradient Podcast: The top interviews with leading AI experts, researchers, developers, and linguists.

Daniel Nest’s Why Try AI?: The most amazing updates on AI tools and techniques

Jason Gulya’s The AI Edventure: An important exploration of cutting-edge innovations in AI-responsive curriculum and pedagogy.